Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2009, pp. 124-138
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1090.0142
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bromiley, P.

A Prospect Theory Model of Resource Allocation

Philip Bromiley

The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
bromiley{at}uci.edu

Many papers in organization theory and strategy use prospect theory, but few derive their hypotheses from prospect theory's formal model. This paper develops a prospect theory model of resource allocation under risk where projects have both positive and negative adjusted payoffs. The model assumes consistent value (rather than profit) maximizing behavior and demonstrates how resources, risk propensity, and reference levels interact to determine allocations to risky projects. The analysis shows that prospect theory's parameters interact in complex ways to influence risk taking, which makes simple predictions difficult. Overall, loss aversion and the reference point dominate the results, with curvature of the value function playing a secondary role and the maximum risk aversion occurring for firms near their reference points, not for firms above their reference points.

Key Words: prospect theory; resource allocation; research and development; risk aversion/tolerance; organizational studies; strategy
History: Received on July 2, 2008. Accepted on February 24, 2009.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2009; 6(3): 121 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.