Decision Analysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DECISION ANALYSIS
Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2009, pp. 172-185
DOI: 10.1287/deca.1090.0146
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ewing, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, E.

Development of a Green Building Decision Support Tool: A Collaborative Process

Ben Ewing, Erin Baker

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002

bewing{at}iso-ne.com
edbaker{at}ecs.umass.edu

In this paper, we discuss a collaborative process for developing a decision tool to support decisions around investment in green energy technologies. Our tool was developed specifically for the Hitchcock Center for the Environment, a local environmental education organization, and the development process began as an undergraduate student service learning project. Building on the student projects, we developed an Excel-based tool that allows users to select various combinations of technologies and instantly see the financial, environmental, and educational impacts of their choice. Given our initial parameters and the preferences of the Hitchcock Center staff, the optimal configuration included installing a biomass heating system and a composting toilet, but avoiding investment in other green technologies, yielding an annualized preference-adjusted cost of $5,252.58. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the optimal choice was not sensitive to environmental valuations, and only slightly sensitive to educational values. All participants in the process found the concept and practice of value elicitation to be useful and illuminating.

Key Words: environment; green building; decision analysis; energy
History: Received on June 30, 2008. Accepted on April 27, 2009.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
L. R. Keller
From the Editor...
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2009; 6(3): 121 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.